by Axel Pinz, Walter Kropatsch, Alois Hinterleitner, Johann Petrak
Abstract:
In this report we assess image processing hardware and software from a university institute's point of view. After giving a brief sketch of the overall situation and a review of related work on computer vision systems and image analysis benchmarks, we proceed with a description of typical image analysis tasks. There are basic-, mid- and high-level tasks in education, research and consulting. Three types of image processing systems are defined: general, hardware oriented, and software oriented. We conclude that ``the appropriate system'' does not exist, so that a heterogeneous network of several different image analysis components constitutes the best solution.
Reference:
Evaluation of Image Processing Systems for Application in Research and Education (Axel Pinz, Walter Kropatsch, Alois Hinterleitner, Johann Petrak), Technical report, PRIP, TU Wien, 1991.
Bibtex Entry:
@TechReport{TR012,
author = "Axel Pinz and Walter Kropatsch and Alois
Hinterleitner and Johann Petrak",
institution = "PRIP, TU Wien",
number = "PRIP-TR-012",
title = "Evaluation of {I}mage {P}rocessing {S}ystems for
{A}pplication in {R}esearch and {E}ducation",
year = "1991",
abstract = "In this report we assess image processing hardware
and software from a university institute's point of
view. After giving a brief sketch of the overall
situation and a review of related work on computer
vision systems and image analysis benchmarks, we
proceed with a description of typical image analysis
tasks. There are basic-, mid- and high-level tasks
in education, research and consulting. Three types
of image processing systems are defined: general,
hardware oriented, and software oriented. We
conclude that ``the appropriate system'' does not
exist, so that a heterogeneous network of several
different image analysis components constitutes the
best solution.",
url = "https://www.prip.tuwien.ac.at/pripfiles/trs/tr12.pdf",
}